Broker Check
Sustainable Investing and Free Speech: Navigating the Anti-ESG Backlash

Sustainable Investing and Free Speech: Navigating the Anti-ESG Backlash

May 03, 2024

In recent years, sustainable investing has emerged as a powerful force in the financial world, driven by a growing awareness of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues among investors and an explosion in the number of ESG investment offerings from financial companies. This approach to investing seeks to generate positive returns while also making a positive impact on society and the environment. However, as sustainable investing gains momentum, it has also become entangled in debates surrounding free speech, particularly in the face of a mounting backlash from some Republicans seeking to restrict ESG investing and protect the interests of corporations, particularly fossil fuel companies.

Fundamentally, sustainable investing is not a liberal vs. conservative issue, it is a free speech issue that should unite all who value the freedom of expression and the US Constitution. It reflects the fundamental right of individuals to express their values and beliefs through their investment decisions and I believe that viewing sustainable investing through this lens offers a path forward for sustainable investors and asset managers.

  1. Shareholder Advocacy:

One of the core tenets of sustainable investing is shareholder advocacy. Investors leverage their ownership stakes in companies to advocate for changes aligned with their ESG priorities. This may include pushing for greater transparency on environmental impacts, diversity initiatives, or labor practices. Shareholder proposals serve as a vehicle for investors to express their beliefs and influence corporate behavior, exercising their right to free speech within the realm of corporate governance. Within the sustainable investing world, the most well-respected firms have some of the most active shareholder advocacy practices. At Green Future Wealth Management, our Investment Committee incorporates a fund’s level of advocacy into our selection process and our financial advisors report on shareholder advocacy initiatives when meeting with clients, as it is one of the ways that the sustainable investor can create the impact they desire through their investment dollars. As a shareholder, your right to vote on shareholder proposals is one of the most valuable tools you have to express your wishes, and ultimately to shape the behavior of a company that you partially own.  

  1. Corporate Disclosure:

Transparency and disclosure are central to sustainable investing. Advocates for ESG integration often call for companies to disclose their ESG risks and performance metrics, enabling investors to make informed decisions. This demand for greater transparency aligns with the public's right to know and facilitates informed dialogue on corporate responsibility. However, efforts to mandate ESG disclosure have faced opposition, with critics arguing against government intervention in corporate affairs, citing concerns about regulatory overreach and infringement on free speech rights. Fundamentally, disclosure and transparency are about the democratization of investment information, which is an underlying tenet of public market investment in the United States: that all pertinent information is available to the entire marketplace and not reserved for a select few or hidden altogether.

  1. Boycotts and Divestment:

Many sustainable investors choose to divest from companies that conflict with their values, such as those involved in industries like fossil fuels or firearms. Divestment is a form of protest, akin to a boycott, allowing investors to express their disapproval of certain practices or industries. While divestment is protected as a form of free speech, it has sparked controversy, particularly when it intersects with political agendas. The recent Republican backlash against ESG investing has seen efforts to discourage institutional investors from divesting from fossil fuel companies, framing such actions as detrimental to economic interests and free market principles. After decades of conservatives declaring that the free market will solve our climate problems, now that there is a growing free market approach to boycott and divest, suddenly the free market can’t fix it, in a classic case of moving the political goalpost.

  1. Legal and Regulatory Advocacy:

Advocates of sustainable investing also engage in legal and regulatory advocacy to promote policies conducive to ESG integration. This may involve lobbying for legislation that mandates ESG disclosure, supports renewable energy initiatives, or incentivizes sustainable business practices. However, such efforts have faced pushback from anti-ESG factions, particularly within conservative circles. Republican lawmakers have introduced bills aimed at restricting ESG investing, arguing that it undermines shareholder value and infringes on free speech by imposing ideological preferences on investment decisions. Missing in these bills has been the evidence of either, particularly as more and more research continues to point to increased shareholder value through ESG integration, which is essentially just common sense. Incorporating ESG factors into your analysis means that you are reviewing more data, which should in turn lead you to better decision making. You wouldn’t (or shouldn’t) purchase a car without popping the hood. Incorporating ESG factors into investment decision-making is no different.

Navigating the Anti-ESG Backlash:

The rising anti-ESG sentiment among Republicans underscores the complex interplay between sustainable investing and free speech. While sustainable investors assert their right to express their values through investment choices, they must navigate political headwinds that seek to stifle ESG integration. The current backlash highlights tensions between market freedom and regulatory intervention, as well as competing interpretations of free speech in the context of investment activism.

I do believe that framing the ESG investment conversation as a free speech issue rather than a Democrat vs. Republican issue offers a potential path forward, particularly in those States that have strong Republican governments that have cracked down on sustainable investing. However, the anti-ESG backlash from Republican quarters underscores the challenges facing sustainable investing as it navigates political polarization and ideological divides.